2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1986 Volvo 245
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Volvo 245 (96 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1986 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Volvo 245 (157 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1986 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1986 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 245 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2660 mm |