2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1989 Jaguar XJR-11
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jaguar XJR-11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 (741 HP) has 674 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Jaguar XJR-11. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 (801 Nm) has 651 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1989 Jaguar XJR-11 | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | C2 | XJR-11 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3500 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 741 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 801 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1020 mm |
