2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1989 Volvo 240

To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 240 (115 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 240 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1989 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Volvo 240 (157 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1989 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.

Compare all specifications: