2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 200 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C2 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 134 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2540 mm |
