2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 870 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C2 | Villager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2860 mm |