2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 420 (87 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 420 weights approximately 199 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 420 (184 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (118 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C2 | 420 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 184 Nm |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2750 mm |