2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,530 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Cougar (168 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 349 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Cougar (223 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1999 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C2 | Cougar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2530 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 223 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 58 L |