2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 630 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | C2 | XL7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2737 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 64 L |