2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 303 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4009 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 323 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 84 L |