2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, both 2006 Citroen C2 and 2006 Honda Ridgeline were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Ridgeline (247 HP) has 180 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 142 kg more than 2006 Honda Ridgeline.
Because 2006 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Ridgeline (332 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2006 Honda Ridgeline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2006 Honda Ridgeline | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | C2 | Ridgeline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3472 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 332 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 83 L |