2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, both 2006 Citroen C2 and 2006 Rover 75 were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 189 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C2 | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4601 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.8 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 65 L |