2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2009 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP) has 229 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 2009 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
| Model | C2 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4394 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
