2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,398 cc, 2006 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | C2 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 996 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.8 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2360 mm |
