2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (171 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 489 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda Tribute (232 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4442 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 66 L |