2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2010 Volvo C30

To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 396 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2. 2006 Citroen C2 has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Citroen C2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Citroen C2 2010 Volvo C30
Make Citroen Volvo
Model C2 C30
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 0 HP
Torque 147 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1055 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4252 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2320 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 41 L 60 L