2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (170 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 70 L |