2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2011 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi RVR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi RVR weights approximately 380 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR (196 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2011 Mitsubishi RVR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2011 Mitsubishi RVR | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C2 | RVR |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 196 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4295 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 63 L |