2006 Citroen C2 vs. 2012 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler 200 (173 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 773 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chrysler 200 (225 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 2012 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Citroen | Chrysler |
Model | C2 | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 173 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 64 L |