2006 Citroen C3 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C3 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | 220 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |