2006 Citroen C3 vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volvo 850 (240 HP) has 168 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volvo 850 (407 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1994 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | 850 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2670 mm |