2006 Citroen C3 vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 420 weights approximately 49 kg more than 2006 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 420 (184 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C3 | 420 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 184 Nm |
Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |