2006 Citroen C3 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vector RD 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 113 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3.
Because 2000 Vector RD 180 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector RD 180. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Vector RD 180 (175 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Vector RD 180 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Citroen | Vector |
Model | C3 | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2390 mm |