2006 Citroen C3 vs. 2002 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart Roadster would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Smart Roadster (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C3 weights approximately 168 kg more than 2002 Smart Roadster.
Because 2002 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Smart Roadster (110 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 2002 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | C3 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |