2006 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 258 kg more than 2006 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C3 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C3 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 59 L |