2006 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 Volvo S60

To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 469 kg more than 2006 Citroen C3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 2006 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2006 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Citroen C3 2012 Volvo S60
Make Citroen Volvo
Model C3 S60
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 0 HP
Torque 147 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1140 kg 1609 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1864 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 67 L