2006 Citroen C4 vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Citroen C4 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C4 (108 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2006 Citroen C4.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Citroen C4 has automatic transmission and 1949 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1949 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Citroen C4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C4 | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C4 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2850 mm |