2006 Citroen C4 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Citroen C4 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C4. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 295 kg more than 2006 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C4 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Citroen | Talbot |
| Model | C4 | Baby |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3130 mm |
