2006 Citroen C4 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Citroen C4 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C4. (90 HP @ 1900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C4 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C4 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C4 | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 1900 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |