2006 Citroen C4 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Citroen C4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C4 (181 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C4 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C4 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C4 | 66 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1412 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |