2006 Citroen C4 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Citroen C4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C4. (90 HP @ 1900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C4 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C4 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 1900 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
