2006 Citroen C5 vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2006 Citroen C5 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C5 (132 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Citroen C5 has automatic transmission and 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Citroen C5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C5 | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C5 | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3260 mm |
