2006 Citroen C5 vs. 1973 Rover P5B

To start off, 2006 Citroen C5 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,526 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C5 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1973 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1973 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C5 weights approximately 74 kg more than 1973 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C5. (286 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1973 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C5.

Compare all specifications: