2006 Citroen C5 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Citroen C5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C5 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C5 weights approximately 349 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C5 (285 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C5 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C5 | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2945 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1694 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 80 L |
