2006 Citroen C5 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2006 Citroen C5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C5 (204 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C5 weights approximately 181 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C5 (285 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C5 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C5 | Sable |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2945 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1694 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 68 L |