2006 Citroen C5 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C5 (108 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C5 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C5 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C5 | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |