2006 Citroen C8 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Citroen C8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C8. (157 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C8 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C8 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2230 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.6 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
