2006 Citroen C8 vs. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2006 Citroen C8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C8 (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C8 weights approximately 298 kg more than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C8 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C8 | 2004 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
Model | C8 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 162 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |