2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 388 kg more than 2006 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen Xsara | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Xsara | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1948 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
