2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen Xsara (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen Xsara | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Citroen | Triumph |
| Model | Xsara | Renown |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
