2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (94 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 649 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen Xsara | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | Xsara | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 33 L |
