2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 1978 Zastava 132

To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 147 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: