2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 374 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen Xsara (205 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen Xsara | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1224 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |