2006 Citroen Xsara vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka

To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 34 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen Xsara. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen Xsara. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 2006 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2006 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: