2006 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Daihatsu Sirion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Daihatsu Sirion (86 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Daihatsu Sirion (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Daihatsu Sirion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Daihatsu Sirion | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Daihatsu | MCC |
| Model | Sirion | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 1810 mm |
