2006 Dodge Caravan vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Dodge Caravan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Caravan (151 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Caravan (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Caravan | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Caravan | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2430 mm |
