2006 Dodge Caravan vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Dodge Caravan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 151 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1973 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Caravan (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Caravan | 1973 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Dodge | Datsun |
| Model | Caravan | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
