2006 Dodge Caravan vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 2006 Dodge Caravan is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Caravan (151 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.

Because 1979 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Caravan (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Dodge Caravan 1979 Mazda Cosmo
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Caravan Cosmo
Year Released 2006 1979
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2507 cc 1768 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 151 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 226 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 65 L