2006 Dodge Caravan vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2006 Dodge Caravan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 216 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Caravan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Caravan | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Caravan | CLK |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 367 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 88 L |