2006 Dodge Caravan vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 3,309 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Caravan. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2006 Dodge Caravan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Caravan (285 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Caravan | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Caravan | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3309 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
