2006 Dodge Charger vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Charger | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2500 mm |